l i n u x - u s e r s - g r o u p - o f - d a v i s
Next Meeting:
July 7: Social gathering
Next Installfest:
Latest News:
Jun. 14: June LUGOD meeting cancelled
Page last updated:
2011 Nov 28 14:17

The following is an archive of a post made to our 'vox mailing list' by one of its subscribers.

Report this post as spam:

(Enter your email address)
Re: [vox] Regarding: "Stop Online Piracy Act" that everybodyscreams about...
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [vox] Regarding: "Stop Online Piracy Act" that everybodyscreams about...

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [vox] Regarding: "Stop Online Piracy Act" that everybody
> screams about...
> From: Bill Broadley <bill@broadley.org>
> Date: Tue, November 22, 2011 10:42 pm
> To: vox@lists.lugod.org
> On 11/22/2011 08:41 PM, Mikies Runs Baal wrote:
> > Heya Bill,
> > 
> > Besides me, has anyone bothered to d/l and read the actual bill to find 
> > out IF and WHAT the hubris is actually about.
> I've not read it, care to summarize?  I found this link but no idea how
> biased it is:
> http://mashable.com/2011/11/16/sopa-infographic/

Well, this viewpoint is definitely biased against the bill. It admits,
"An activist group organized by the Electronic Frontier Foundation
Creative Commons, Mozilla, Public Knowledge, the Free Software
and others who oppose the bill, created the infographic."

I would even go to say it's propaganda. The first sentence is,
"A new bill will allow the US Government to block Americans from
visiting websites." Following, it lists 3 totalitarian countries
(including China) using blocking technology. Then it says it's
going to summarize the bill: "As with any bill, it’s complicated,
but this infographic boils it down." But still, you have to press
a link to get any idea of what the proponents are saying.

However, that link doesn't "boil it down" either. The best
proponent information is, "While they support the bill’s goals
of preventing rogue sites from distributing copyrighted
materials, ..." Well, that seems prudent -- copyright
laws go back to colonial times, and they should be
enforced. If a rogue site is giving away an art that
the artist should otherwise receive a royalty, then
the government should try to prevent this theft.

I tracked down the actual bill:

The key sentence is:
"In GENERAL -- A service provider shall take technically feasible and
reasonable measures designed to prevent access by its subscribers
located within the United States to the foreign infringing site
(or portion thereof) that is subject to the order, including measures
designed to prevent the domain name of the foreign infringing site
(or portion thereof) from resolving to that domain name's Internet
Protocol address."

The term "foreign infringing site" is not defined. But it can
only mean an Internet site in a foreign country that infringes upon
a U.S. copyright law.

So probably, the top-level domain servers (.com, .net, etc.) will have
to obey a government-produced DNS blacklist. Every IP address
on that blacklist is supposed to be located outside the U.S.,
and the owner(s) of that server are alleged to have hosted
copyrighted material without the copyright owner's permission.

Opinion: This will succeed at mitigating copyright infringement.
(Of course, I can already feel your gears churning with
workarounds.) And it doesn't seem to violate the U.S
constitution. Maybe the devil is in the details.


vox mailing list

LUGOD Group on LinkedIn
Sign up for LUGOD event announcements
Your email address:
LUGOD Group on Facebook
'Like' LUGOD on Facebook:

Hosting provided by:
Sunset Systems
Sunset Systems offers preconfigured Linux systems, remote system administration and custom software development.

LUGOD: Linux Users' Group of Davis
PO Box 2082, Davis, CA 95617
Contact Us

LUGOD is a 501(c)7 non-profit organization
based in Davis, California
and serving the Sacramento area.
"Linux" is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.

Sponsored in part by:
O'Reilly and Associates
For numerous book donations.