Re: [vox] No electronic flaws in Toyotas?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [vox] No electronic flaws in Toyotas?
On 02/08/2011 11:16 AM, Brian Lavender wrote:
> The government says that there are no flaws in Toyotas.
> According to the article, engineers at NASA "reviewed" 280,000 lines of software
> code to look for flaws. I wonder if that means that Toyota's code is available
> for download?
Heh, of course not.
> Or, do you have to sign an NDA that you won't reveal if you find
> any vulnerabilities?
Well publishing a report saying "no flaws" seems like a pretty good vote of
confidence. Or do you think there's a government conspiracy to have
unreliable automobiles in the USA?
> Did anyone bother to ask Toyota why the F**k they took out the throttle cable? It
> doesn't take a NASA an engineer to figure that one out!
I assume you mean why did they replace a throttle cable with a drive by wire
system? If not ignore the below list.
Er, seems like there's lots of reasons:
* People seem to prefer linear power, yet the most efficient engines provide
increasingly non-linear performance.
* Hybrid systems are increasingly common, so a throttle cable is a poor way
to control both an electric and gas motor to achieve what a user expects
with anywhere from 0-100% of the power being provided by either
* Fuel injection is the rule today, the efficiency and reliability over a
traditional carburetor are substantial. Long gone are the days when
it's practical for pedal movement to be mechanically linked to air/fuel
* Increasingly sophisticated transmissions actually tinker with the throttle
to minimize wear, maximize performance, maximize efficiency and minimize
* Traction control can be more efficient and cause less wear and tear if
it controls throttle as well as the brakes. After all why generate
300 HP if you are just going to burn it off on the brakes because of
low traction conditions?
* Reliable starting is easier if the car has some control over the throttle,
this makes it easier to start in a wide variety of temperatures and
altitudes. It also allows for a lighter starter motor(cheaper and less
weight) since it doesn't have to handle the corner cases/abuse that people
* Engines these days will protect themselves from exceeding a maximum RPM,
some use ignition retardation some use throttle. Each has their advantages
All in all cars seem better with CPU controlled throttle, transmission, and
> BTW, you can pick up an ECM at TAP recycling in Sacramento in case anyone wants
> to hook up the computer and try to find the corner case for unintended acceleration.
> I picked up one for my Celica for two hundred bucks.
You don't think toyota and other interested parties have done this?
Has anyone found a positive result?
Is it too much to expect that people hit the brakes if they are going faster
than they intend? Or shift to neutral? Or hit the emergency brake? Turn the
car off? Or do you think it's a 5 way failure?
Is there any reason to not think that it's just idiots that hit the wrong
pedal? Just like happened with Audi, in the 1980s or so? (and the dozens of
other companies investigated) Seems like some small percentage of people just
freak when they get a surprise because they hit the wrong pedal, and of course
in today's litigious society they blame the car maker.
So sure people like media attention and do something dramatic like have a 23
minute call with 911 while driving an "impossible to stop" car.
So sure the media likes the fan the flames, fake tests (like 60 minutes) and
people get excited about the horrible miscarriages of justice carried out by
these car manufacturers. The reality seems to be that cars are amazingly (but
not perfectly of course) reliable.
I'm interested in any information to the contrary, but this sounds exactly
like the audi fiasco which from what I can tell was entirely people hitting
the wrong pedal. Unfortunately audi marketing managed to get Americans used
to very wide brake pedals to buy audi who had a narrow brake pedal. There
were plenty of horrible stories about loved ones getting run over (sometimes
more than once), driving through the back of garages, rear ending other cars,
crazy out of control cars flying around etc. In reality people were hitting
the gas instead of the brake and freaking out.
vox mailing list