l i n u x - u s e r s - g r o u p - o f - d a v i s
Next Meeting:
July 7: Social gathering
Next Installfest:
Latest News:
Jun. 14: June LUGOD meeting cancelled
Page last updated:
2010 Sep 14 13:27

The following is an archive of a post made to our 'vox mailing list' by one of its subscribers.

Report this post as spam:

(Enter your email address)
Re: [vox] Stuff you really need to run a GNU/Linux network
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [vox] Stuff you really need to run a GNU/Linux network

Hello Minna-san,

There's also the x500 directory server.

I like OpenLDAP.  SUSE uses it as an evolutionary stage from storing
user id information in the passwd file, to storing passwords in the
shadow file, to storage in OpenLDAP, either on the LAN or the
standalone workstation.  I rather like that.

Michael Cheselka

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 04:55, Gandalf  Parker <gandalf@community.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Brian Lavender wrote:
>> I think to really catapult GNU/Linux, we have to be able to easily
>> deploy these services. Otherwise, we'll just remain hobbyists or single
>> server hackers (with backups).
> HEY is that a shot at me? (gee thanks :)
> This is a great discussion (one of the better ones) but its mostly
> opinions. Everything has its pros and cons. I cant really FAULT your
> choices. But it sounds more like an internet providor than a server (I
> know because Ive worked SysAdmin for ISPs). I didnt see anything in the
> original request that spoke a need for multiple servers. If it had then
> some of my recommendations would have agreed with yours. That seems more
> of a "growth" plan you are laying out.
> The desire for a server, is the desire (usually) to simplify an
> arrangement that already consists of many machines in the same
> environment. Jumping directly to many servers seems abit quick (or job
> security)
>> And speaking of backups, what better way can you think besides having
>> an offsite backup of rsyncing your data to another hot fail server?!!!
> This I do agree with. Its the system I used at home (for as long as it
> lasted). Ive also used various fancier forms of backup both network
> servers for the military and for ISPs. No matter what they used
> (compression schemes, tapes, CDs, etc) I much preferred a full
> uncompressed working copy. Anytime there was a need to use the other
> methods we had to reremember or reresearch the way to do it, or worse yet
> found that the rotations had failed or the media gotten corrupt.
> A full version makes it easy to see if it worked, to copy back only
> cerrtain files, or to simply put the backup server online with a simply
> change of address. The backup machine doesnt have to be an exact match in
> size and power. And some use for it can be found to alleviate load on the
> main server
> Gandalf  Parker
> --
> Debian is server
> Google is my operating manual
> Forums are my customer service
> Total cost? nothing.
> Satisfaction? priceless.
> _______________________________________________
> vox mailing list
> vox@lists.lugod.org
> http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox
vox mailing list

LUGOD Group on LinkedIn
Sign up for LUGOD event announcements
Your email address:
LUGOD Group on Facebook
'Like' LUGOD on Facebook:

Hosting provided by:
Sunset Systems
Sunset Systems offers preconfigured Linux systems, remote system administration and custom software development.

LUGOD: Linux Users' Group of Davis
PO Box 2082, Davis, CA 95617
Contact Us

LUGOD is a 501(c)7 non-profit organization
based in Davis, California
and serving the Sacramento area.
"Linux" is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.

Sponsored in part by:
O'Reilly and Associates
For numerous book donations.