l i n u x - u s e r s - g r o u p - o f - d a v i s
Next Meeting:
July 7: Social gathering
Next Installfest:
Latest News:
Jun. 14: June LUGOD meeting cancelled
Page last updated:
2003 Jul 17 13:23

The following is an archive of a post made to our 'vox mailing list' by one of its subscribers.

Report this post as spam:

(Enter your email address)
Re: [vox] MS and Homeland Security
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [vox] MS and Homeland Security

On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 12:32:37PM -0700, ME wrote:
> >> Up spake ME on Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 08:32:32PM -0700:
> >> > One of the long-known weaknesses in MS Windows has been a lack of
> >> built-in
> >> > low-bandwidth remote control systems such as those we have with *NIX
> >> > solutions like ssh and use of a remote shell.
> Eric D. Pierce said:
> > http://tech.erdelynet.com/cygwin-sshd.html
> After having been an NT Admin for Windows NT 3.5.1, 4.0 (Server Edition),
> Windows 2000 Advanced Server Edition, administering a small Citrix Server
> farm, and generally windows support, I can tell you that use of telnet or
> ssh to use cmd.exe as a "shell" for a windows server just does not cut it.

Who said anything about using cmd.exe? Use it together with Cygwin's
bash.exe: that's what the URL above *says*.

> Most major things require a gui.

Hm... unfortunately true for many things. Still could be helpful,
though, if you're also running Apache httpd and some other, more
UNIX-centric stuff. Hell, if I was given no choice about what OS to
run, but they didn't care what actual services I used, sshd would be
all I need :)

> And for those who state such a thing is not an issue, MS has stated they
> think it is an issue, and they have plans to include support to configure
> most of their services with something like a remote shell that does not
> need to be halted for upgrades. It is enough of an issue for MS to
> conceede this as a failing ("failing" is not their word) by choosing to
> offer support for this in future products.

They could do this just by allowing all configuration to be stored in
text-based files, and/or registry keys which are easily accessed via a
supplied CLI tool (not terribly difficult to write). Then they can
build the GUIs on top of those, and everyone's happy.

My 2,
vox mailing list

LUGOD Group on LinkedIn
Sign up for LUGOD event announcements
Your email address:
LUGOD Group on Facebook
'Like' LUGOD on Facebook:

Hosting provided by:
Sunset Systems
Sunset Systems offers preconfigured Linux systems, remote system administration and custom software development.

LUGOD: Linux Users' Group of Davis
PO Box 2082, Davis, CA 95617
Contact Us

LUGOD is a 501(c)7 non-profit organization
based in Davis, California
and serving the Sacramento area.
"Linux" is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.

Sponsored in part by:
Appahost Applications
For a significant contribution towards our projector, and a generous donation to allow us to continue meeting at the Davis Library.