Re: [vox] [OT] Learning to program
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [vox] [OT] Learning to program
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 10:53:55AM -0700, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> begin Joel Baumert <email@example.com>
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 12:13:25AM -0700, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> > > begin Matthew Johnson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > > > On Sunday 25 August 2002 13:38, Micah Cowan wrote:
> > > > > matthew johnson writes:
> > >
> > > i guess i'm the poster child for doing it yourself. never took a CS
> > > class in my life.
> > When would a tree data structure be better than a hashed data structure?
> but joel, that was my point. i learn when the need arises. that's the
> fundamental process of a person who learns on his own.
I disagree here. Your examples here show the difference between
theory and application. With the exception of spinlock verses
semaphore you are talking about application specific topics that
a programmer is going to have to learn in each situation.
There is a basic level of knowledge that I would expect from a
hire at Z-World. I expect them to have a certain level of
general knowledge about the field like the trade offs between
hashes, trees, lists, etc. I also expect them to have competency
in specific skills and application domains like knowing the C
language. For a software engineering position, I don't want
to have to explain link lists or how to program in C. I want
someone that will take a look a design proposal and be able
to discuss the relative merits and choices that can be made.
I think many people can look up how to initialize the GTK+
library, but the same people are going to have a hard time
understanding the distinctions between spin locks and semaphores
without some breadth of knowledge that most people would have
a problem finding on the Internet. If you do a search on
spin lock good lucking finding a definition. I glanced
through the OS books that I have and they didn't mention
it either, though I do remember it being talked about in
one of my OS classes.
I am not knocking learning on your own, but giving some
guidelines for learning that will make sense for different
goals. If you want to be a professional software engineer
it is getting more difficult to do that without a degree.
Possible, but more difficult, especially with the bubble
> but remember -- this is your JOB. it's my PAST TIME. i do it simply
> out of the sheer enjoyment.
I think that we are pretty much saying the same thing. I
suspect you would be board silly in the basic C courses, but
you might get something out of the data structures and
algorithm courses that would help your past time. When
the past time becomes a career then it may be a different
matter. Your physics degree gives you a leg up because
it shows that you can problem solve and have probably been
exposed to computers over someone without a degree when
you are looking for a job.
> my assertion is this: while i may not have the depth of knowledge you
> have, i can read books. i can use google. i can post to vox-tech. i
> enjoy learning new things. that would make me a valuable programmer,
> whether i have formal education or not.
> and to be fair to me, i've met quite a few CS undergrads who don't like
> what they do. comparing notes, i'm a MUCH better programmer than these
> people who are formally educated. and believe it or not, i have quite a
> lot of experience which you yourself don't have. my breadth of
> programming knowledge is quite large.
Absolutely. There was (probably is) an easy path to a CS degree
at Davis, where you do the minimum necessary to graduate. That
person will probably not make a good programmer because they
don't have either the spark or acquired the knowledge that
was offered to them.
> joel, i'd be the LAST person to dis formal education. look at me.
> i wouldn't have been in college so damned long if i felt differently.
> however, i would be the first to say that desire is the mother of
> the good.
Agreed. You have to love to tinker and have a high tolerance
for frustration to program. I saw many people in the CS program
that did not have either trait and are probably not programmer
now (5 years later).
vox mailing list