Re: [vox] Fwd: RE: 168.150.101.101

[ME <dugan@MAPSpasswall.com>]

Well gee, if it is all being passed through a transparent proxy, couldn't
you have over 50 per day if you have a lot of users reading from and
posting to slashdot through their proxy?

Could this be normal use, and if so, won't it happen again unless they
make an exception?


On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> Got you all unbanned.
> 
> Matt
> PS :P
> 
> ----------  Forwarded Message  ----------
> 
> Subject: RE: 168.150.101.101
> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 20:19:02 -0400
> From: "Rob Oostendorp" <Robo@slashdot.org>
> To: "Matthew Johnson" <matthew@psychohorse.com>
> 
> Someone from Omsoft was requesting too many slashdot rdf/xml pages. If
> you've been running any kind of script, bot, or any other third party
> software (KDE Newsticker) please reconfigure to download no more than 50
> pages/day.
> 
> You've been unbanned,
> Thanks,
> Robo
> Robo@slashdot.org
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Johnson [mailto:matthew@psychohorse.com]
> Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 1:19 PM
> To: banned@slashdot.org
> Subject: 168.150.101.101
> 
> 
> Can you tell me how and wehn I got banned? Makes no sense...Unless someone
> now
> owns my machine, or a web browser took over and flooded Slashdot.
> 
> I'm dazed and confused...
> 
> Matt
> Ps IP address is again 168.150.101.101
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> vox mailing list
> vox@lists.lugod.org
> http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox
> 

_______________________________________________
vox mailing list
vox@lists.lugod.org
http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox