l i n u x - u s e r s - g r o u p - o f - d a v i s
Next Meeting:
July 7: Social gathering
Next Installfest:
Latest News:
Jun. 14: June LUGOD meeting cancelled
Page last updated:
2002 Feb 26 20:27

The following is an archive of a post made to our 'vox mailing list' by one of its subscribers.

Report this post as spam:

(Enter your email address)
[vox] [ot] Deregulation and Enron.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[vox] [ot] Deregulation and Enron.

My read of the situation is that both Enron and Andersen Consulting
broke the law and it seems likely that some people will at least have
to defend themselves from a series of criminal and civil actions.

I'm not sure that there was a breakdown in legislation with the
possible exception of Andersen having a conflict of interest between
their responsibilities as an auditor and their business consulting
unit.  There should have been more distrust and oversight from the
auditors.  I think that Andersen Consulting will be severely damaged
by the civil suits.  Enron is out of business and their officers
will probably have most of their money taken from them in litigation.

I doubt there will be any winners in this situation and hopefully
some of these turkeys will go to jail.

I don't see how de-regulation created this situation and how the
regulatory bodies would have done a better job.  Are you suggesting
that the government should take over the role of Andersen for all
corporations?  That would be a big mistake and would probably not
solve the basic problem that people willing to break the law uh...
break the law.

It is unfortunate that many people lost money on this company
either through direct investment or indirectly through mutual funds
(like I did), but I don't think that a large bureaucracy of 
government auditors are going to help here.  There will be some
fine tuning here and there, but the main change will be when the
auditors see that their company is in danger if they are not 
aggressive in uncovering mismanagement.

I saw the debates on 401k reform... Maybe there is some merit in
restricting the percentage of stock in someone's portfolio, but I
would rather see some sort of notification when that percentage
is high to the employee and a guarantee of a choice to move their
money into a more diversified account.  It would be a shame to 
limit informed people from investing (err... gambling) in a 
company they think will do well...


On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 05:54:11PM -0800, ME wrote:
> With the distrust of corps to regulate themselves (by way of Enron
> scandal) de-regulation initiatives and bills passing the House may be
> possible, bt passing the Senate seems unlikely.
> But I am just a computer nerd, so what do I know?
> -ME
vox mailing list

LUGOD Group on LinkedIn
Sign up for LUGOD event announcements
Your email address:
LUGOD Group on Facebook
'Like' LUGOD on Facebook:

Hosting provided by:
Sunset Systems
Sunset Systems offers preconfigured Linux systems, remote system administration and custom software development.

LUGOD: Linux Users' Group of Davis
PO Box 2082, Davis, CA 95617
Contact Us

LUGOD is a 501(c)7 non-profit organization
based in Davis, California
and serving the Sacramento area.
"Linux" is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.

Sponsored in part by:
Sunset Systems
Who graciously hosts our website & mailing lists!