Re: [vox] [OT] junk mail (physical, not UCE)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [vox] [OT] junk mail (physical, not UCE)
begin: Brad Benedict <bradb@afes.com> quote
>
> > i respond to each and every single piece of spam, with absolutely no
> > exception. and i'm relentless. using nslookup, whois and traceroute, i
> send
> > complaints to loads and loads of people, including 2 or 3 sites upstream
> from
> > the place that sent the spam, dns servers, noc's, the offending host and
> > every host which obviously belongs to the same domain that gets listed
> with
> > traceroute. it's kind of the "this car is insured by smith and wesson"
> type
> > of response.
>
> You wanna tell me how to do that? I've tried it before, but I find that
> most IPs are spoofed, and I can't find where it actually came from.
nope. in fact, most IP's are /NOT/ spoofed.
it's very difficult to maintain a tcp connection when one party doesn't know
where to send packets to. the information is there. you just need to parse
it.
never look at From or Return-Path headers; those usually are forged. always
looked at Received: headers. and when Received headers ARE forged, most of
the time you'll be able to tell which ones are bogus.
> It's a felony in Norway to send spam.
that's prolly way out of line... you don't need to be convicted of a felony
to get jail time.
i wonder what joel will have to say about this. probably one of the few
things we would ever agree upon... :-)
> But then they let convicted murderers
> out on the weekends, if they ask. pfft. Anyway, if more countries made it
> a felony, I bet we would see a lot less.
i'd be willing to bet this is not quite right -- you can't let high risk
folks out of their cells. there has to be more to the story to that.
perhaps people convicted of manslaughter? i dunno. there's got to be more
to the story here.
pete
--
"The following addresses had permanent fatal errors..." p@dirac.org
-- Mailer Daemon www.dirac.org/p
|