Re: [vox-tech] spam current events
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [vox-tech] spam current events
On Thursday 31 August 2006 04:32 pm, p-at-dirac.org \(Peter Jay Salzman\)
> On Thu 31 Aug 06, 2:47 PM, Rod Roark <email@example.com> said:
> > On Thursday 31 August 2006 13:51, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> > > i'm getting hammered with email containing text designed to trick
> > > bayesian filters....
> > I think content filtering is almost a waste of time. As you see,
> > spammers can always design content that gets past the filters. What
> > else are you doing to combat spam?
> I'm using a multi-tiered approach. You'd be surprised at the most
> effective (for me) anti-spam measures.
> # By default, smtpd_client_restrictions is applied at the RCPT TO
> command. # To have the restriction take effect ASAP, do this (may cause
> unexpected # results with poorly impolemented client software):
> smtpd_delay_reject = yes
I've seen people say that a multiline greet also confuses some spamware.
> reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org
> reject_rbl_client sbl.spamhaus.org,
You outh to replace these two with sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, which imports CBL.
> You'd be shocked at the effectiveness of rejecting email that says it comes
> from "dirac.org" or email that doesn't have a valid fqdn sender.
> The rules prefixed by '*' are _extremely_ effective. Also, this catches
> most viruses (you most likely use the same thing):
> /^TVqQAAMAAAAEAAAA\/\/8AALg/ REJECT
> win32 executable attachments are not accepted here.
> /^(Wk|TV)..............\/\// REJECT
> DOS executable attachments are not accepted.
> /^UEsDBAoAA/ REJECT
> Zip file attachments are not accepted; use bzip2 (.bz2) or gzip
> (.gz) instead.
> and lastly, these are HIGHLY effective too:
> dirac.org REJECT You are not in dirac.org (1). Go away, spammer.
> www.dirac.org REJECT You are not in dirac.org (2). Go away, spammer.
> mail.dirac.org REJECT You are not in dirac.org (3). Go away, spammer.
> localhost REJECT You are not my localhost (4). Go away, spammer.
> 192.168.0.1 REJECT You are not in dirac.org (5). Go away, spammer.
Yeah, I get boat loads of spammers claiming to be my servers in helo too.
> I also use this to filter out bogus virus messages. This really saves me a
> lot of stress when the new MS virus du jour comes out. It goes into
> I also drop companies that I did business with and who *relentlessly*
> spammed me afterwards after repeated pleas for them to stop. Two companies
> that come to mind are:
> They get REJECTed for persistently spamming me.
I use sneakemail for dealing with companies on the internet. It has the nice
effect of allowing me to track who's whoring out my address. Setting up a
catch-all address scheme can similarly be used, but I'd rather just not have
to deal with the email after I decide to deactivate an address.
> All this stuff is done at the MTA level, so no delivery is attempted. If a
> spam does get through, and this is *exceedingly* rare, it has to contend
> with bogofilter, spamassassin, and procmail, in that order.
> I can, literally, go months before spam reaches my inbox. I've totally
> forgotten what it was like to even get spam, which is why the
> "image001.gif" thing was so distressing. I forgot what spam was like.
> If you're interested, I can compile a more comprehensive list including all
> the nitty gritty details of my various Postfix files, procmail filters,
Take a look at the imageinfo spamassassin plugin and the SARE rulesets.
People have reported good results with these.
Ryan Castellucci - http://ryanc.org/
GPG Key: http://ryanc.org/files/publickey.asc
vox-tech mailing list