l i n u x - u s e r s - g r o u p - o f - d a v i s
Next Meeting:
July 7: Social gathering
Next Installfest:
Latest News:
Jun. 14: June LUGOD meeting cancelled
Page last updated:
2002 Feb 27 12:16

The following is an archive of a post made to our 'vox-tech mailing list' by one of its subscribers.

Report this post as spam:

(Enter your email address)
Re: [vox-tech] another gcc question
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [vox-tech] another gcc question

begin Gabriel Rosa <grosa@ucdavis.edu> 
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> > another optimization question:
> >
> >    int n = 5;
> >    for (i=0; i<n; ++i)
> >
> > can gcc unroll this loop the way it can (for instance)
> >
> >    #define N 5
> >    for (i=0; i<N; ++i)
> Refer to previous answer.
> if you use -funroll-all-loops, yes.
i realized that i wrote that email rather stupidly.

just to be clear, i know that you can unroll a loop when testing the
iterator against a macro.  i was asking about a simple variable
assignment like

int n=2;
for (i=0; i<n; ++i) 

so i assume your answer would be "no" for -funroll-loops.

the reason why i'm asking is that this is completely deterministic, and
a compiler can know, with certainty, that this loop will iterate over 0
and 1.  that is, you can know this at compile time, before executing any

clearly, this ISN'T deterministic:

int n=2;
for (i=0; i<n; ++i) 

but certainly, this is:

int n=2;
for (i=0; i<n; ++i) 

vox-tech mailing list

LUGOD Group on LinkedIn
Sign up for LUGOD event announcements
Your email address:
LUGOD Group on Facebook
'Like' LUGOD on Facebook:

Hosting provided by:
Sunset Systems
Sunset Systems offers preconfigured Linux systems, remote system administration and custom software development.

LUGOD: Linux Users' Group of Davis
PO Box 2082, Davis, CA 95617
Contact Us

LUGOD is a 501(c)7 non-profit organization
based in Davis, California
and serving the Sacramento area.
"Linux" is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.

Sponsored in part by:
Appahost Applications
For a significant contribution towards our projector, and a generous donation to allow us to continue meeting at the Davis Library.