l i n u x - u s e r s - g r o u p - o f - d a v i s
Next Meeting:
July 7: Social gathering
Next Installfest:
Latest News:
Jun. 14: June LUGOD meeting cancelled
Page last updated:
2001 Dec 30 17:07

The following is an archive of a post made to our 'vox-tech mailing list' by one of its subscribers.

Report this post as spam:

(Enter your email address)
Re: [vox-tech] sgml, xml question
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [vox-tech] sgml, xml question

On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 12:14:52PM -0700, Henry House wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 11:23:47AM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote:
> [...]
> > No.  These are all /target/ formats for SGML processors such as jade.
> > DocBook is a purely content-oriented documentation method - more
> > content-oriented than LaTeX, which is still a package written in a
> > typesetting language (TeX); and so necessarily display-oriented to at
> > least some degree.  Converting from LaTeX to SGML is about as
> > difficult as converting PostScript to LaTeX.  You'll have to translate
> > to SGML by hand.
> I disagree. Converting the subset of LaTeX concerned with /semantic markup/
> is certainly possible and may be done programatically. Don't know of any tool
> that does this, alas. Of course, if you dip into the vast formatting
> possibilities that TeX offers, you are on your own.

You are right, of course.  But this would be a /subset/ of LaTeX,
since any knowledgeable LaTeX user may feel free to use TeX constructs
when it suits him.  Also, there are a variety of widely used LaTeX
constructs (\hwide, etc.) which have no translation to DocBook, since
they are formatting-oriented.  Consider too the famous math-formatting
tools which LaTeX has, which DocBook proper cannot render - though the
committee has recently added a MathML module to DocBook, which should
do quite nicely.

As I wrote the above, I knew that LaTeX which conforms to unduly
strict confinements could be converted - probably pretty easy with a
good awk script.  But it would only be a relatively small subset of
LaTeX.  Additionally, the same thing could be said of PostScript -
since it is a language, after all.  If people were to confine
themselves to some arbitrary, more content-oriented functions or
something, it would be /possible/.  But as I said, the two
propositions are about the same level of difficulty, and I doubt
anyone will ever develop tools for either problem.

> [...]
> > Isn't Henry doing a talk on SGML/XML soon?  I'm sure he'll probably be
> > talking about DocBook, since it's probably the single most widely used
> > SGML application next to HTML (which is sort of bastardized SGML these
> > days).
> Not that I know of ;-). I'm certainly willing to take a stap at it though.

You're on the "to be scheduled" list for SGML and TeX (not XML, sorry!)


LUGOD Group on LinkedIn
Sign up for LUGOD event announcements
Your email address:
LUGOD Group on Facebook
'Like' LUGOD on Facebook:

Hosting provided by:
Sunset Systems
Sunset Systems offers preconfigured Linux systems, remote system administration and custom software development.

LUGOD: Linux Users' Group of Davis
PO Box 2082, Davis, CA 95617
Contact Us

LUGOD is a 501(c)7 non-profit organization
based in Davis, California
and serving the Sacramento area.
"Linux" is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.

Sponsored in part by:
Appahost Applications
For a significant contribution towards our projector, and a generous donation to allow us to continue meeting at the Davis Library.