l i n u x - u s e r s - g r o u p - o f - d a v i s
Next Meeting:
July 7: Social gathering
Next Installfest:
Latest News:
Jun. 14: June LUGOD meeting cancelled
Page last updated:
2001 Dec 30 16:59

The following is an archive of a post made to our 'vox-tech mailing list' by one of its subscribers.

Report this post as spam:

(Enter your email address)
Re: [vox-tech] Partition Questions Part 1
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [vox-tech] Partition Questions Part 1

  • Subject: Re: [vox-tech] Partition Questions Part 1
  • From: Mark Kim <mkkim@ucdavis.edMAPSu>
  • Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 02:29:40 -0800
  • References: 3A2F327E.26664961@ucdavis.edu

On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Robert G. Scofield wrote:

> According to the Installation Guide for RedHat 6.1 you should create
> only these partitions unless you have a reason to do otherwise:

Guidelines.  You can ignore them freely.  Everyone has his/her own reason
for partitioning things his/her own way.  I like:

   /          (where all distribution-specific stuff goes)
   /usr/local (default install place for all downloaded programs)
   /home      (so I can save my work across upgrades)
   swap       (since it's good to have virtual memory)

And /boot if / doesn't fit under 1024 cylinder thing.

> Scenario 1:  I misuse rm -r and decide that I have to re-install RedHat
> 6.1.

Don't do it.  Put -i on rm alias.

> Scenario 2:  I decide to install (not upgrade to) RedHat 7.0 over RedHat
> 6.1.

If you use my partition settings, you can:

   1. Archive /etc in case you'll need config stuff later for customization
   2. Format / partition
   3. Install 7.0 to / partition.

And everything you had before is still there, including home and
downloaded programs.

> Scenario 3:  I decide to install Suse over RedHat 6.1.

Same as above.

> Now is the advantage in having separate partitions that in each of these
> scenarios I can install over RedHat 6.1 without wiping out my files in
> /home and my application programs in /usr/local?  I know that if
> everything is under /, a re-installation will wipe out all of my
> programs and files.  So is this the main point in having separate
> partitions?

There are many many reasons for having partitions.  One common reason is
for when one partition gets damaged, you'll still have other partitions
safe.  Multiple Linux distributions is one reason -- you can have SuSE on
/dev/hda1 and Debian on /dev/hda2 yet have the same /home on /dev/hda3 and
swap on /dev/hda4... -- this way you can try out different distributions
without having separate /home and /swap.

> Is what I am suggesting true?  Would it be possible to install Suse over
> RedHat and expect my programs to run as usual?

Pretty much.  Some upgrades may be necessary if /usr/local has programs
that require a certain version of some runtime library, in which case
either the program or the librarie(s) need to be upgraded.


Mark K. Kim
PGP key available upon request.

LUGOD Group on LinkedIn
Sign up for LUGOD event announcements
Your email address:
LUGOD Group on Facebook
'Like' LUGOD on Facebook:

Hosting provided by:
Sunset Systems
Sunset Systems offers preconfigured Linux systems, remote system administration and custom software development.

LUGOD: Linux Users' Group of Davis
PO Box 2082, Davis, CA 95617
Contact Us

LUGOD is a 501(c)7 non-profit organization
based in Davis, California
and serving the Sacramento area.
"Linux" is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.

Sponsored in part by:
Appahost Applications
For a significant contribution towards our projector, and a generous donation to allow us to continue meeting at the Davis Library.